web analytics

Latest Tweets

Ex-Facebook President Warns App Exploits Psychological ‘Vulnerability’ infowars.com/ex-facebook-pr… via @RealAlexJones

Last week from systembreakdown.net's Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite

Aug 302014
 

A breakthrough report on the nutritional density of genetically-modified(GM) corn crops demolishes all existing claims that GMOs are “substantially equivalent” to non-GMOs.

Entitled 2012 Nutritional Analysis:
Comparison of GMO Corn versus Non-GMO Corn, the paper reveals not only that GMO corn is greatly lacking in vitamins and minerals compared to non-GMO corn, but also that it is highly toxic and filled with deadly crop chemicals like glyphosate (Roundup).

Are GMOs safe?
Most developed nations do not consider GMOS to be safe. In more than 60 countries around the world, including Australia, Japan, and all of the countries in the European Union, there are significant restriction or outright bans on the production and sale of GMOs. In the U.S. and Canada,both governments have approved GMOs based on studies conducted by the same corporations that created them and profit from their sale.

 

Video Transcript:

“I’ve heard, not only in your country but also in my country, and united states scientists say, and some government people say, we must be part of this new technology, this new technology is crazy science, its unsafe science, and its not proven science.

and if we’ve had, in north america, 11,12 years of GMOs, how come we don’t have lots of food now to feed the hungry world?

The corporations want total, total control of the seed supply, which will then give them total control of the food supply.

In japan, I met with a lot of scientists, consumers, processors and importers, and this document here is a condensed version of the all the scientific studies the Japanese have done using Monsanto’s data, is over 50 pages long.

Monsanto always use the term “substantially equivalent” that the food is very similar, the Japanese scientists say that it is NOT “substantially equivalent” the food is different and that you’ve changed, in true genetic engineering, or genetic modification, you’ve changed the structure of the food, and that it is not the same, and it can have very harmful allergens, or bacteria then, because the viruses and the bacteria that they use for the transferring genes are also in that food, So, it is NOT the same, and it can have very possible long range health effects by eating it.
In other words, what Monsanto presented, to our governments in north america, is false, and that, it is not safe and it is not “substantially equivalent” which means it’s not the same as other regular food, and that has been a major major announcement, by the Japanese scientists”

Aug 282014
 

In the 1970’s, president Jimmy Carter commissioned the “Global 2000” report.
The findings of the report blamed virtually all of the world problems on the population growth of non-white people.
The report went on as far as recommending the elimination of at least two billion people in third world nations off the face of the earth by the year 2000 in order to restore western supremacy.

Interestingly enough, also in the 70’s, the AIDS epidemic broke out, claiming huge amounts of lives in third world nations, as well as amongst a growing black and Hispanic population of America.
It was said that the virus originated from green monkeys in Africa, and was later passed on to the local population “through either acts of bestiality or through consuming them as food”.
From there on, AIDS spread like wildfire across the African continent, and later on to the rest of the world, claiming millions of lives.
However, the story was just a smokescreen, on June the 2nd 1988, the LA Times published an article refuting the idea that the human AIDS virus originated from green monkeys, the uncovered evidence that the DNA composition of AIDS, was totally inconsistent with that of green monkeys, in fact, it could be proven that the aids virus could not be found anywhere in nature, and could only have ever survived in the human biological system.

If the virus did not exist anywhere in nature, the question is raised as to where exactly the virus all of a sudden stemmed from.
On July the 4th 1984, the New Delhi newspaper in India called The Patriot published an article making the first detailed charges of AIDS as being a counter biological warfare agent. An anonymous American anthropologist was quoted claiming that AIDS was genetically engineered at a US Army biological warfare laboratory at Fort Dietrich near Frederick, Maryland.
Then on October the 30th, 1985, the Soviet Journal “Lituratania Gazetta” repeated the charges made by the Indian newspaper, making it an international controversy.
All this however was easily passed off as a Communist rhetoric by the Masonic west, however on October the 26th,1986 the Sunday Express became the first western newspaper to run a front page story confirming the findings of the Indian and Soviet newspapers entitled “AIDS Made In Lab Shock”

The outbreak of AIDS has been linked to vaccine programs around the world. The internationally respected London Times newspaper published an article at the front page story on May the 11th, 1987, entitled “Small Pox Vaccine Triggered AIDS”
The article establishes a direct correlation between the small pox vaccine administered by the World Health Organization to an estimated 50 to 70 million people in different central African countries and the subsequent outbreaks of AIDS in those regions.The World Health Organization is the medical wing of the United Nations.

The evidence suggests that AIDS is a genetically engineered virus spread through vaccination programs in third world countries. Germ warfare against the innocent and the weak, aimed at eliminating an entire populace off the face of the earth.

An article published in Rolling Stone magazine by freelance journalist Tom Curtis linked the origin of AIDS to the polio vaccine. “It looked at the polio campaign that Doctor Koprowski had undertaken in the former Belgian Congo in the middle to late 1950’s, and I did focus on that campaign because of certain geographic similarities to where scientists were saying AIDS had begun, and the human population which was in this same region”

Curtis’s hypothesis shook up the scientific community because it questioned the work of Hilary Koprowski, a famous researcher and pioneer in the fight against polio. “There was a lot of concern that it was written by a person who was a professional journalist, and they were afraid that people would no longer immunize their children against polio”

Aug 262014
 

Here is the full transcript of this interview: (Including pre and post video edit)

SCARBOROUGH: I had to wait a second for that, but it was worth the wait.
Anyway, this is where we share the sometimes inhumane ways that corporate America has found to screw consumers. Tonight’s spotlight, the Bayer corporation. And I’ve got to tell you, this is one of the worst drug-related medical disasters I think in history.
And let me bring in Mike Papantonio right now, who is a legal adviser to SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY, to talk about what Bayer did.
Mike, welcome to the show. We appreciate you being on tonight.
MIKE PAPANTONIO, NBC LEGAL ANALYST: Thanks for the invitation, Joe.
SCARBOROUGH: OK, let’s talk about the “Rat of the Week.” Why is Bayer Corporation the “Rat of the Week”?
PAPANTONIO: Internal documents show that after this company positively, absolutely knew that they had a medication that was infected with the AIDS virus, they took the product off the market in the U.S. and then they dumped it in France, Europe, Asia and Latin America. The medicine is called Factor VIII. It was an injection medicine that was used for hemophiliacs, mostly children, children who had been born with an incurable disease.
(CROSSTALK)
SCARBOROUGH: Hold on. So you’re telling me that Bayer knew that this drug was infected with the AIDS virus, they yanked it from the market in America, and then they dumped it in markets overseas?
PAPANTONIO: They had to figure out a way, Joe, to make a profit on a product that they could not sell in America. So they made a huge profit. They dropped the product in Japan, Spain and France.
By the way, Joe, government official in France that allowed that to happen actually had to go to prison for it. In America, not one corporate executive for this company has been indicted or even criminally investigated by our Justice Department.
SCARBOROUGH: Why not? You’re telling me that these people that dump this AIDS-tainted blood in foreign countries, who killed children, have not been taken to task in the United States?
PAPANTONIO: It’s worse than that.
The U.S. government allowed it to happen. The FDA allowed this to happen. And now the government is completely looking the other way. Thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died from the AIDS virus. And not only they are dying. Their family members are dying, because they’re becoming infected with the disease. This company knew absolutely that they had a problem with the product. They knew that it was infected with AIDS.
They dumped it because they wanted to turn this disaster into a profit.
SCARBOROUGH: Mike, I want to read to you what Bayer told “The New York Times” about this scandal.
They said: “Bayer behaved responsibly, ethically, and humanely. Decisions made nearly two decades ago were based on the best scientific information of the time and were consistent with the regulations in place.”
That sounds like a lot of legal mumbo jumbo. Now, you say you have internal documents that show that they knew that this drug they were dumping was tainted with the AIDS virus?
PAPANTONIO: The documents show that there was no question that this company absolutely understood the risk. They knew the it was contaminated. It wasn’t a possibility. They knew it was contaminated.
Americans were dying from the product before it was pulled off the market. The only reason it was pulled off the market is because lawyers found the documents and showed it to the government. And, finally, the government said, you can’t sell it here, but then the government allowed them to dump it in Spain, France and Japan.
(CROSSTALK)
SCARBOROUGH: That’s just amazing.
I want to read to you what “The New York Times” said. And this is an investigation that they also did. And they said, the federal government was part of the problem, while the Food & Drug Administration told the company not to ship the drugs overseas. The man responsible for the drug supply-quote-“asked that the issue be quietly solved without alerting the Congress, the medical community and the public.”
This is a cover-up, and our Congress is not doing anything. What should Americans do? Should they call their congressman? Should they call the FDA? What should they do to take care of this rat?
PAPANTONIO: Joe, I don’t think it does any good to call the government. The government has seen the problem. They’re ignoring it. It’s pretty obvious that our government doesn’t care.
But one thing you can do is understand that, every time you buy one of these products from Bayer Corporation, a German corporation, every time you buy one of their products, you are participating with a company that killed unsuspecting hemophiliacs by the thousands. And you know what? They got away with it. This is a company that only Ann Coulter could love. Thanks, Joe.
SCARBOROUGH: Oh, don’t say that. Don’t say that, Mike. You’re killing me here. I love Ann Coulter.
Well, thanks so much for being with us. And if you don’t watch yourself, you’re not going to come back to tell us who the “Rat of the Week is.” Seriously, thanks for coming on the show.
And I’ve got to tell you, Bayer, what a rat. You should be ashamed of yourself.